2nd
Punic War
In 1938, democratic
Czechoslovakia was assailed by Germany that it treats its German minority
badly. When the Prague government tried to give in to the demands, the demands
became bigger and less palatable. Hitler in Germany was agitating against
Czechoslovakia, and was preparing for war, unless Czechoslovakia cedes
Sudetenland with German majority to Germany. Small Czechoslovakia was prepared
to defend itself, because it had a pact with France and Great Britain for
military help. However, prime ministers of Great Britain, Chamberlain and of
France, Daladier, were not eager to fulfill their treaty obligations. Great
Britain send a “fact finding” lord Runciman, instead of weapons in August. At
the end of September, the Munich pact was signed, and Czechoslovakia was abandoned
to Hitler. By this action, or inaction, the peace was not saved, but led to a
most devastating war in the history of mankind.
Part of Forum Romanum today |
Part 1.
The 2nd Punic war
started with something closely resembling the Munich Agreement of WWII. The city of Saguntum in Spain was a Roman
Friend and Ally and was attacked by Hannibal in 219 BC. Saguntum sent envoys to
Rome asking for help and for honouring the treaty of friendship. Roman Senate,
as mentioned above, was deeply involved in Illyria and keeping an eye on
Macedon. Therefore sending legions to the other end of the Mediterranean to
help a city, about which most of the Romans knew nothing, did not seem like an
expedient move. The Senate sent a fact finding commission of inquiry.
The envoys in the commission pointed out to Hannibal and
Carthaginian council that Saguntum has a treaty with Rome. Hannibal considered
it interference in Carthaginian sphere of influence. The commission returned
without any visible result, and the siege of Saguntum continued. Rome did
nothing, except for preparing two
consular armies for expedition to Illyria. Saguntum fell to Hannibal after 8
months siege with attending burning and enslaving of the population. Just to make the Romans feel really guilty, the leading Saguntine citizens heaped their property in the square, set fire to it and jumped into the flames.
Public opinion in Rome was stirred. A Roman ally with a
treaty was destroyed! What a surprise, that an earnest commission did not chase Hannibal
from Saguntum's walls! An embassy of leading Roman senators and both consuls went to
Carthage to demand the surrender of Hannibal and compensation for the
Saguntines. The Roman historian Livy vividly described the scene in the
Carthaginian council. The Romans gave
Carthage the choice between peace and war, between surrendering Hannibal and
keeping him. The Carthaginians, still smarting from their losses more than 20
years before, chose war.
Carthage never regained her naval power, and Roman fleets
were roaming the western Mediterranean at will, therefore the logistics how to
get to Italy and into an actual war became formidable. Hannibal solved it
brilliantly. He went by land, north in Spain and marched through the sunny
southern French coast, known in 21st century for the gambling Monte Carlo,
film festival in Nice and the generally peaceful area of Provence.
Hannibal
knew that the north Italian Gallic tribes did not reconcile themselves yet to
being a province of Rome, and hoped to find allies there. His Carthaginian
experience also suggested, that the Roman allies up and down the Italian
peninsula will happily throw off their shackles of Roman overlordship and
welcome him as their liberator, probably with flowers liberally strewn under
the feet of his Spanish mercenaries by pretty maidens.
Two consular armies, that is 4 legions altogether were
prepared for further action in Illyria. They were diverted to prevent Hannibal
from reaching Italy. Consul Scipio hurried to southern France, to prevent
Hannibal from crossing the river Rhodanus (Rhone). However, not having good
intelligence, satellite surveillance and GPS, he missed Hannibal and stood at
the river, looking like a fool, while Hannibal continued on to Italy. But…
Scipio was Roman and not a fool. He realized that the important thing now would
be to cut Hannibal off his supplies of material and men from his base and
recruiting ground in Spain. Scipio knew, in difference to Hannibal, that Rome's Italian allies will not desert Rome in hurry. Scipio sent his brother to Spain with an army and
he himself returned to Italy with two legions to help with stopping Hannibal.
Hannibal meantime went with his men and elephants over
the Alps into Italy. Some Gallic tribes, as could have been expected, attacked
his army for booty, others joined him for booty. Hannibal defeated consul
Scipio and the consul retreated behind the Po River and waited for
reinforcements, mainly the consul Sempronius with his army. The Roman Senate
was very clever and wanted to bring the war to Carthage, and Sempronius with
his legions was waiting for transport to Africa. This suggested that the Senate
was still not clear about the fact that they are dealing with a brilliant
commander and that the Romans would need all the help they could get just to
survive, and not to think yet about sending any troops away.
To prove it, consul Sempronius let himself to be lured
into a trap and lost most of his army in 218 BC. It seemed, that the Roman
Republic lost its luck and that the best commanders were retired. Another
consul, Flaminius, bit the dust with most of his men in 217 BC at the Lake
Trasimene in Etruria, today Tuscany.
Afterwards, Hannibal waited for delegations from Roman allies who would
eagerly join him. None were coming. That was unfortunate for him, because
without some material and manpower support from the locals, he could not hope
to attack Rome itself, like Pyrrhus before him.
The Trasimene thrashing instilled enough panic into
Romans and the consul named a Dictator, the aging Quintus Fabius Maximus. Fabius already realized Hannibal’s tactical
brilliance and decided that the Romans will lose any direct battle. His tactics
could be called guerrilla tactics, shadowing Hannibal’s army from one town to
another and preventing him from regrouping and cutting him from supplies, and
cutting down all foraging parties or detached units. This was smart, but the
Roman SPQR wanted a decisive victory and ridiculed Fabius with a nickname
“Cunctator”, the hesitant one.
In this
spirit, the Romans elected new consuls for the year 216 BC, who were definitely
decisive. Consuls Gaius Terentius Varro and Lucius Aemilius Paullus had together 80 thousand
men, whom they led into a REALLY decisive disaster.
At the village of Cannae they lost most of the men, only 15 thousand
saved themselves, and consul Paullus died. Among the officers who saved some
men and themselves was fortunately young Publius Cornelius Scipio, son and nephew of the two men who
commanded the Roman army in Spain.
This was a real test of the Roman Friends and Allies, because 40 thousand of those men were supplied by the Rome's Italian allies.
Battle of Cannae |
This was a real test of the Roman Friends and Allies, because 40 thousand of those men were supplied by the Rome's Italian allies.
Cannae today |
Dear Eva: Thank you for another insightful story from classical times, which you parallel with similar events of 20th century; I did my share of reading about WW2, but as I remember, it was never pointed in such a way that there is "nothing new under the sun" like you did. Please, keep writing, I am curious about the second part of this war. I am eagerly waiting. (And I hope that many readers of your blog). How do you promote it to mass audience?
ReplyDeleteThe second part will show how the name Cunctator transformed into a positive one.
ReplyDelete